Monday, September 29, 2008

Examining the EPDS - what Obama wants to be used to examine mothers.












Hello,

I have had some great comments recently about my post concerning Obama Vs McCain. I want to thank the people that spent the time to give me feedback - even the ones that I did not post.


But one thing that I wanted to mention was what the EPDS is - This is the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and is what is used when a mother potentially might have Post natal depression.


I am not against people being helped as some have mentioned this to me - its just that I do not agree with all forms of "help"


I mean you must admit that Hitler did think he was helping the rest of the "pure race - blonde hair and blue eyes" by getting rid of Jews and other nonsense but was that really "Help?" NO!


So back to this scale - This scale is used to determine if a person needs treatment for being depressed after having a baby - I have included it here:



Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)



"As you have recently had a baby, we would like to know how you are feeling. Please UNDERLINE the answer which comes closest to how you have felt IN THE PAST 7 DAYS, not just how you feel today.



I have been able to laugh and see the funny side of things.

As much as I always could Not quite so much now Definitely not so much now Not at all I have looked forward with enjoyment to things.

As much as I ever did Rather less than I used to Definitely less than I used toHardly at all
----------------
* I have blamed myself unnecessarily when things went wrong.

Yes, most of the time Yes, some of the time Not very often No, never
----------------
I have been anxious or worried for no good reason.

No, not at all Hardly ever Yes, sometimes Yes, very often
----------------
* I have felt scared or panicky for not very good reason.
Yes, quite a lot Yes, sometimes No, not much No, not at all
----------------
* Things have been getting on top of me.

Yes, most of the time I haven't been able to cope at all Yes, sometimes I haven't
been coping as well as usual No, most of the time I have coped quite well No, I have been coping as well as ever
----------------
* I have been so unhappy that I have had difficulty sleeping.

Yes, most of the time Yes, sometimes Not very often No, not at all
----------------
* I have felt sad or miserable.

Yes, most of the time Yes, quite often Not very often No, not at all
----------------
* I have been so unhappy that I have been crying.

Yes, most of the time Yes, quite often Only occasionally No, never"

----------------
* The thought of harming myself has occurred to me. Yes, quite often Sometimes Hardly ever Never


So - that is the scale.


Now - my main upset with this is two fold...


1. The "handling" for someone like this is getting put onto prescription medication such as : selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), tricyclics, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (NDRI), combined reuptake inhibitors, receptor blockers and monamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI). There are MANY different types but the main thing is this... It does not handle the problem! These drugs adjust the different fluids in your brain, and if you actually study these drugs you will find that that there is NO clear knowledge as to what is going on completely. These drug side effect are almost exactly what its supposed to be handling - and there are no tests that can deem what you need IE - what fluid is out of wack etc! IT DOES NOT EXIST - So when someone says Prozac or Zyprexa its a guess!!!

2. My other upset is that when a women gives birth it is a MAJOR cycle for the body and for the most part there hormones and basic body functions and levels are up and down so yes a woman can feel all over the place and then after birth you give them lots of love and nutrients and vitamins and supplements and they do well.

I could go on and on but my main point is - I dont like it as it is NOT adressing the problem! I respect Mothers and think we should pay them more respect then giving them a trial and error method approach. I would think that you would also agree.


Well?

Monty


What would Ron Paul do?









Here is something that I was able to get that is Ron Paul's ideas and suggestions as to what is going on in the current financial market and its impact upon all of us.


Later - Monty
----


The financial meltdown the economists of the Austrian School predicted has arrived.
We are in this crisis because of an excess of artificially created credit at the hands of the Federal Reserve System. The solution being proposed? More artificial credit by the Federal Reserve. No liquidation of bad debt and malinvestment is to be allowed. By doing more of the same, we will only continue and intensify the distortions in our economy - all the capital misallocation, all the malinvestment - and prevent the market's attempt to re-establish rational pricing of houses and other assets.
Last night the president addressed the nation about the financial crisis. There is no point in going through his remarks line by line, since I'd only be repeating what I've been saying over and over - not just for the past several days, but for years and even decades.
Still, at least a few observations are necessary.The president assures us that his administration "is working with Congress to address the root cause behind much of the instability in our markets." Care to take a guess at whether the Federal Reserve and its money creation spree were even mentioned?
We are told that "low interest rates" led to excessive borrowing, but we are not told how these low interest rates came about. They were a deliberate policy of the Federal Reserve. As always, artificially low interest rates distort the market. Entrepreneurs engage in malinvestments - investments that do not make sense in light of current resource availability, that occur in more temporally remote stages of the capital structure than the pattern of consumer demand can support, and that would not have been made at all if the interest rate had been permitted to tell the truth instead of being toyed with by the Fed.
Not a word about any of that, of course, because Americans might then discover how the great wise men in Washington caused this great debacle. Better to keep scapegoating the mortgage industry or "wildcat capitalism" (as if we actually have a pure free market!).
Speaking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the president said: "Because these companies were chartered by Congress, many believed they were guaranteed by the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put our financial system at risk."
Doesn't that prove the foolishness of chartering Fannie and Freddie in the first place? Doesn't that suggest that maybe, just maybe, government may have contributed to this mess? And of course, by bailing out Fannie and Freddie, hasn't the federal government shown that the "many" who "believed they were guaranteed by the federal government" were in fact correct?
Then come the scare tactics. If we don't give dictatorial powers to the Treasury Secretary "the stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet." Left unsaid, naturally, is that with the bailout and all the money and credit that must be produced out of thin air to fund it, the value of your retirement account will drop anyway, because the value of the dollar will suffer a precipitous decline. As for home prices, they are obviously much too high, and supply and demand cannot equilibrate if government insists on propping them up.
It's the same destructive strategy that government tried during the Great Depression: prop up prices at all costs. The Depression went on for over a decade. On the other hand, when liquidation was allowed to occur in the equally devastating downturn of 1921, the economy recovered within less than a year.
The president also tells us that Senators McCain and Obama will join him at the White House today in order to figure out how to get the bipartisan bailout passed. The two senators would do their country much more good if they stayed on the campaign trail debating who the bigger celebrity is, or whatever it is that occupies their attention these days.
F.A. Hayek won the Nobel Prize for showing how central banks' manipulation of interest rates creates the boom-bust cycle with which we are sadly familiar. In 1932, in the depths of the Great Depression, he described the foolish policies being pursued in his day - and which are being proposed, just as destructively, in our own:
Instead of furthering the inevitable liquidation of the maladjustments brought about by the boom during the last three years, all conceivable means have been used to prevent that readjustment from taking place; and one of these means, which has been repeatedly tried though without success, from the earliest to the most recent stages of depression, has been this deliberate policy of credit expansion.
To combat the depression by a forced credit expansion is to attempt to cure the evil by the very means which brought it about; because we are suffering from a misdirection of production, we want to create further misdirection - a procedure that can only lead to a much more severe crisis as soon as the credit expansion comes to an end... It is probably to this experiment, together with the attempts to prevent liquidation once the crisis had come, that we owe the exceptional severity and duration of the depression.
The only thing we learn from history, I am afraid, is that we do not learn from history.The very people who have spent the past several years assuring us that the economy is fundamentally sound, and who themselves foolishly cheered the extension of all these novel kinds of mortgages, are the ones who now claim to be the experts who will restore prosperity! Just how spectacularly wrong, how utterly without a clue, does someone have to be before his expert status is called into question?Oh, and did you notice that the bailout is now being called a "rescue plan"? I guess "bailout" wasn't sitting too well with the American people.The very people who with somber faces tell us of their deep concern for the spread of democracy around the world are the ones most insistent on forcing a bill through Congress that the American people overwhelmingly oppose. The very fact that some of you seem to think you're supposed to have a voice in all this actually seems to annoy them.I continue to urge you to contact your representatives and give them a piece of your mind. I myself am doing everything I can to promote the correct point of view on the crisis. Be sure also to educate yourselves on these subjects - the Campaign for Liberty blog is an excellent place to start. Read the posts, ask questions in the comment section, and learn.H.G. Wells once said that civilization was in a race between education and catastrophe. Let us learn the truth and spread it as far and wide as our circumstances allow. For the truth is the greatest weapon we have.



In liberty,

Ron Paul

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Washington Mutual is up for sale?!?!?






Washington Mutual, the giant US savings and loan bank beleaguered by mortgage losses, has put itself up for sale.
The Seattle-based bank has hired Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to run an auction and potential suitors include Citigroup, HSBC Holdings, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo, one source said.
A sale is neither imminent nor guaranteed and the bank is exploring other options, a second source said.
Advertisement
Analysts have long expected the credit crisis would force weaker lenders into the arms of stronger rivals. A sale of Washington Mutual, the largest US savings and loan bank, had been widely expected.
On Monday, Bank of America agreed to pay $50 billion for Merrill Lynch, which has lost $19.2 billion in the last four quarters.
Wachovia, which lost $9.11 billion in the second quarter, approached Morgan Stanley about a merger yesterday, according to published reports.
WaMu overcame a critical hurdle to a merger yesterday when its largest investor, David Bonderman's private equity firm, TPG, agreed to let the bank raise capital, even if TPG's holdings were diluted.
Washington Mutual shares rose have fallen 94% in the last year on concern about mortgage losses and that, in a worst case scenario, it might face the same fate as mortgage lender IndyMac Bancorp, which regulators seized in July.
Washington Mutual has lost $6.3 billion in the last three quarters and was downgraded to junk status by Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's. The bank has projected $19 billion of mortgage losses until 2011.
Last week, Washington Mutual said it expected to set aside $4.5 billion for credit losses in the third quarter, down from the second quarter's $5.9 billion, and that it expected to remain well-capitalised.
JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon is considered the most likely acquirer, given his goal of expanding in retail banking in the western US.
Washington Mutual ended June with $309.7 billion of assets and 2,239 branches.
---
Later - Monty

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Its 9/11 again













Well it is 9.11.08 and I thought it was time to bust out a good poem because of it. And hear she is:


America still survived


It was one sunny Tuesday
And the entire street is so busy

And people working quietly
Happy and free from anxiety.

Hours passed so quickly
When they heard a sound deafeningly

That distressed them miraculously
Where they work peacefully.

A moment after, they glanced up the sky
And could feel the building wobbly

That made the room sooty and dusty
Screams and cries could be heard ubiquitously

And rushing people finding their way
People are under fire and creepy

From that awful tragedy today
And the heartbreaking wound of the blast.

Thank you God for comforting those who grieve
And giving us new hope and Light

For bringing us to a new bliss of Life

America still Survived!!!

Thanks again to all the people that went out of there way to assist and god bless all the fire fighters!!! You are what keeps America safe.

Later - Monty

This is uncensored territory baby!: McCain vs Obama on mental health

This is uncensored territory baby!: McCain vs Obama on mental health

This is uncensored territory baby!: McCain vs Obama on mental health

This is uncensored territory baby!: McCain vs Obama on mental health

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

McCain vs Obama - Where do they stand on mental health?







Mr. Obama is a charming man. However, I will not be voting for him.


There are many issues with his candidacy, including his rise to power in the wretchedly corrupt Cook County political system (his first election was won through pure chicanery, where he used technical loopholes to disallow the candidacies of every single opponent, thus running unopposed).

Despite the eloquence and good looks, make no mistake about it: The man is a very, very savvy politician. And with his reversal on the critical FISA amendment (granting immunity to telcom companies, despite an earlier stated promise to filibuster such an act), he is proven to be, simply, like all the rest.

His agenda is clearly socialist -- simply go to his website and read for yourself. There's also some indication (not completely founded, but worthy of some research) that he found inspiration in the revolutionary writings of French psychiatrist Frantz Falon, where there are some parallels to Falon's work in Obama's book, Dreams of My Father (feel free to Google this).

There's also the other issue of his unabashed support of mental health policies.

* Background Data *

The "New Freedom Commission on Mental Health"

The New Freedom Commission on Mental Health is a 93-page report put together by the psychiatric/pharmaceutical industry in 2003 as a recommendation to the President for mental health plans in the US.

The only words to describe the recommendations of this report are "Orwellian" and horrifying.
This plan lays out detailed programs to screen all Americans for mental "disorders" and includes recommended drug treatment plans. It includes specific mental health screening programs for the elderly, all military personnel, all U.S. school children, drug addicts (and redefining drug addiction as a mental "disease") the poor, screening all pregnant women and infants, (the Mothers Act and another bill detailed below) specific drug treatment "flow charts," mental health "parity" (equal coverage for mental illness as that granted for real physical illness/disease) and more.

It also includes a comprehensive drug plan, which is basically a flow chart of psychiatric drugs -- essentially "try this drug; if it fails, try this other drug; if that fails, combine drugs; if that fails? down to electroshock."
Please keep this in mind when reading the following data.
More on the New Freedom Commission (from Wikipedia):


The Mothers Act:
This is a bill that calls for mental health screening and "treatment" of all pregnant women and those who have recently given birth.

Obama is one of 10 co-sponsors.

McCain is not.


More information on the Mothers Act:

http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/803007275.html

* Obama: "Mental health screenings for all troops" *
In remarks prepared for delivery on Sunday, the Illinois Democrat proposed changes to recruitment and deployment of military mental health providers.
He called for the Pentagon to recruit more professionals to help identify and treat problems. And he seeks mandatory mental health screenings of all troops.
According to Obama's plan, the military would require face-to-face mental health screenings for all service members. By making it mandatory, Obama said the military could reduce the stigma associated with mental health screening and treatment.
The plan also would institute early mental health screenings so future psychological injuries could be more easily diagnosed and treated.
http://www.thenewhampshireprimary.com/news/2007_05_28_news_1.html

McCain opposes this bill.
http://tinyurl.com/6a9deq
Obama on McCain: "I have great respect for John McCain's service to this country and I know he loves it dearly and honors those who serve. But he is one of the few Senators of either party who oppose this bill."
http://tinyurl.com/5t7zbr

* Mental Health "Parity" *
Obama: "I am a longtime supporter of mental health parity. I helped pass the Illinois mental health parity law. And my national public health plan will include coverage of all essential medical services, including preventive, maternity and mental health care. I strongly support mental health fairness and parity of mental health coverage in all federal health programs. I cosponsored the Mental Health Parity Act of 2007 and I am a supporter of the bipartisan Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007.
Similarly, I believe in prohibiting group health plans from imposing treatment or financial limitations on mental health and substance related disorder benefits that are different from those applied to medical or surgical services. I am also committed to ensuring that Americans with disabilities or mental illness receive Medicaid and Medicare benefits in a low cost, effective and timely manner."
http://www.yourcandidatesyourhealth.org/profile.php?c_id=MjU1MjQx

McCain has voted against mental health parity and, in his health care plan on his website, makes no mention of mental health as an issue.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/6/02436/44844/247/588598

* Mental Health Screening of Low-Income Families *
"Barack Obama would expand the highly successful Nurse-Family Partnership to all low-income, first-time mothers. The Nurse-Family Partnership provides home visits by trained registered nurses to low-income expectant mothers and their families. The trained nurses use proven methods to help improve the mental and physical health of the family by providing counseling on substance abuse, creating and achieving personal goals, and effective methods of nurturing children."
http://www.nationalplatforms.com/candidates/barack_obama.html
More information on the Nurse-Family Partnership: "Early detection and treatment of mental disorders can result in a substantially shorter and less disabling course of illness. As the mental health field becomes increasingly able to identify the early antecedents of mental illnesses at any age, interventions must be implemented, provided in multiple settings, and connected to treatment and supports.
"Early interventions, such as the Nurse-Family Partnership, and educational efforts can help a greater number of parents, the public, and providers learn about the importance of the first years of a child's life and how to establish a foundation for healthy social and emotional development. Quality screening and early intervention should occur in readily accessible, low-stigma settings, such as primary health care facilities and schools, and in settings where a high level of risk for mental health problems exists, such as juvenile justice and child welfare."

http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/FinalReport/FullReport-05.
htm

* Side-by-Side Comparison *
Obama's and McCain's Positions on Mental Health Care
http://tinyurl.com/5svtgk
The above is an excellent article comparing the two candidates. Here are some excerpts:
Barack Obama's position on mental health issues as stated in his health care
plan:
Obama specifically includes mental health care in his health care plan.
It states: Improve Mental Health Care. Mental illness affects approximately one in five American families. The National Alliance on Mental Illness estimates that untreated mental illnesses cost the U.S.
more than $100 billion per year. As president, Obama will support mental health parity so that coverage for serious mental illnesses are provided on the same terms and conditions as other illnesses and diseases.
John McCain's position on mental health issues as stated in his health care plan: McCain's health care plan does not mention mental health.
Obama and McCain on H.R. 1424/S558 "Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007? Bill:
Obama co-sponsored, along with 56 others, the bipartisan Senate's S558 version of H.R. 1424 "Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007? bill.
McCain did not sponsor the bill. The White House is opposed to it.
* In Their Own Words *
Barack Obama:
"As you may know, mental illness affects approximately one in five American families, and we must do more address this issue. The National Alliance on Mental Illness estimates that untreated mental illnesses cost the U.S. more than $100 billion per year. As a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, I worked to improve mental health services for people with serious problems who are going untreated and undiagnosed.
"It is important to end discrimination against those with mental illness, and that's why I support the bipartisan Paul Wellstone (D-MN) Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007, an updated version of legislation that Senator Wellstone championed for over a decade in Congress. This bill works to end discrimination against people suffering from mental illness and addiction.
"I also support mental health parity. When suicide is responsible for more deaths in America than AIDS and homicides combined, we must act.
That's why I have championed efforts to improve awareness of mental illnesses and provide timely and appropriate treatment, and why I cosponsored the Mental Health Parity Act of 2007. Parity means that we don't allow group health plans to impose treatment or financial limitations on mental health benefits that are different from those applied to medical or surgical services. The bill closes the loopholes that allow discrimination in coverage that does not apply to other illnesses.
"I'm proud of my record on this issue. I helped pass mental a health [sic] parity bill as an Illinois state senator that requires coverage for serious mental illnesses to be provided on the same terms and conditions as are applicable to other illnesses and diseases."
http://psychcentral.com/lib/2008/obama-on-mental-health-care/


John McCain:
"The next President will face a great challenge due to the rising cost of health care of all types. America has the finest doctors and medical science, and the treatment of mental health has shared in these advances. However, as with other aspects of our health care system, spending on mental and behavioral health treatments is rising rapidly.
The challenge is to ensure high quality care, establish incentives to control the growth of costs, and thereby permit greater affordable choices.
?
"A sensible goal is to design reimbursement for taking care of the whole patient, whatever ails them, and recognize the essential role mental health treatment plays in the overall health of the patient and the reduction in physical health needs.
"I have stressed the central role of personal responsibility in leading to lower health care costs. Personal fitness and better lifestyles, especially reduction in addictions of all types - food, narcotics, or cigarettes - can yield dramatic improvements in the cost of chronic illness and high?cost medical care. We can do a better job of treating addictions, but we also have an obligation to do a better job of teaching our children the benefits of good lifestyles and the perils of addictive activities."
http://psychcentral.com/lib/2008/mccain-on-mental-health-care/


The VPs
Joe Biden: Redefining Drug Abuse and Alcohol Abuse as a Mental Illness and Changing the Names of Government Organizations to Reflect This
A bill introduced by Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) that would define addiction as a brain disease is moving in the Senate. Treatment professionals, mainstream scientists, and recovery advocates see it as a good thing.
There are some skeptics, though. The bill, the Recognizing Addiction as a Disease Act of 2007 (S. 1011), would also change the name of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to the National Institute on Diseases of Addiction, and change the name of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism to the National Institute on Alcohol Disorders and Health. "Addiction is a neurobiological disease -- not a lifestyle choice -- and it's about time we start treating it as such,"
said Sen. Biden in a statement when he introduced this bill this spring.
"We must lead by example and change the names of our federal research institutes to accurately reflect this reality. By changing the way we talk about addiction, we change the way people think about addiction, both of which are critical steps in getting past the social stigma too often associated with the disease."
http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking07/BrainDisease.html
Gov. Sarah Palin has no national record on introducing legislation on mental health issues.
http://tinyurl.com/57dma8

Conclusion: Who Do Psychs Pick?
From PsychCentral.com:
"Based upon our findings, we'd have to say the stronger mental health and psychology candidate is Obama. Whereas McCain tends to support mental health causes when in the majority, he doesn't appear to go out on a limb for anything in the areas of mental health or psychological sciences funding.
Obama, on the other hand, has co-sponsored a major piece of Senate legislation in mental health (mental health parity) and shows he understands the stigma still associated with mental health issues in his co-sponsorship of the Mothers Act."
http://tinyurl.com/6orx35

From AnxietyPanicHealth.com:
"McCain does not mention mental health care in his health care plan, and his approach to it is not clear. His response to the National Alliance on Mental Illness questionnaire seems to combine mental and physical health together in a more holistic approach. He states that he would, 'where possible provide incentives to treat physical and behavioral health together.' This implies that he would favor the first line care of mental health issues to be handled by family physicians or primary care doctors rather than by mental health professionals."
http://tinyurl.com/5svtgk

From "Psychiatrists for Obama":
"We are a group of psychiatrists who support Obama and his positions on ensuring effective mental health care for the disenfranchised. Adequate access to treatment for mental illness and addiction is our main concern in this regard."
http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/PsychiatristsforObama

From DailyKos.com:
"Obama co-sponsored and voted for mental health parity bill that requires coverage for serious mental illnesses to be provided on the same terms and conditions as are applicable to other illnesses and diseases. McCain has voted against mental health parity and, in his health care 'plan' on his website makes no mention of mental health as an issue.
"The choice is very clear if one cares about this issue."
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/6/02436/44844/247/588598


---


Later - Monty